In a story which
Dr. John Baker once told me that, one of the Cockrill family members lost their
ranch and land to the railroad in Tulare county around the time of the Mussel
Slough Tragedy. A couple of agents were sent down by a well-to-do buyer who
lived in Sacramento to run the ranch, after he obtained it by auction after the
Southern Pacific Railroad foreclosure. Shortly after, however, these two agents
went out hunting, and had a "hunting accident" where they were mysteriously
dispatched by parties unknown, though it was generally understood that this
Cockrill family member had something to do with it.
On further
questioning, Dr. Baker told me that he had first heard this story from Jeanne
Miller, rather than one of his other family sources. Jeanne gotten this story
from The Mussel Slough Tragedy, by J. L. Brown (USA, J. L. Brown, 1958),
pp. 113-115: |
Marshal Drew came to
Hanford toward the end of November, 1883, for the purpose of ejecting settlers
from railroad lands. A news report stated that he brought with him on the train
teams of wagons and several men to assist him. After he had called in the
evening at the home of John W. Cockrell, two miles west of Hanford, and found
no one at home, he made a second call early the next morning, still failing to
find Mr. Cockrell, two miles west of Hanford, and found no one at home, he made
a second call early the next morning, still failing to find Mr. Cockrell. He
gave out the information that in order to avoid trouble he was prepared to buy
some fowl and hay that were on the place, but the owner, not wishing to sell,
made no effort to see him. The ejectment was said to have been in favor of one
Knox, a lumber dealer of Sacramento; and two men, J. H. Riley and Edwin H.
McAuliffe, had come with the marshal to take formal possession for Knox.
Cockrell had held the land since 1875, having purchased from John Morrow a
claim that was said to antedate the grant to the railroad company. He had
sought and been refused the privilege of filing on it in the Land Office branch
in Visalia.
Riley and McAuliffe
established themselves in the house. Local citizens were reported to be very
much stirred up over the new and peculiar eviction and to fear a recurrence of
violence similar to that of May 11 [Mussel Slough Tragedy], three and half
years earlier. The reasons for the unusual anxiety are not fully clear, but the
possibility that it was based upon threatening talk suggests itself. The two
men had visitors at the house, including at separate times Major McQuiddy and
J. J. Doyle [of the Settlers' Land League], who
was described in the news report as "the agitator." The visitors asked
questions but gave no orders and made no threats, though they let it be known
that they did not approve what was going on. On Sunday, after the men had been
in the house for several days, a Mexican came, acted strangely, Riley said, and
tried to enter the house.
A short time before
sundown one evening McAuliffe went out with a shotgun to shoot doves -- against
the advice of Riley. Remaining at the house, Riley heard several shots. When
his companion failed to return, he thought it unsafe to go out to look for him
after dark. Next morning he went to the home of a neighbor, William Clough, and
asked that a search be made for the missing man. Soon the lifeless body of
Edwin McAuliffe of San Francisco was found near a willows at the slough, where
he had been shot. Riley said he had heard two shotgun shots, then three rifle
shots, and a little later two more shots. He thought the first three rifle
shots had been fired by three different men, but he did not explain why he
thought so. Three bullets had passed through the body of the unfortunate
McAuliffe.
The settlers were
greatly concerned over the murder, for which some among them might be blamed,
though it could not possibly have done them any good. They stood ready to
render any possible aid in finding the guilty persons. The coming of the
Mexican to the house was at first considered a clue; but nothing came of the
clue, and the visit, remaining unexplained, could not be shown to have any
connection with the crime. All efforts to find the culprit or culprits were
fruitless.
|